The current issue of Newsweek features a provocative takedown of Markos Moulitsas Zuniga, also known as Kos, the titan of the blogging left who has come under heavy fire lately from his fellow bloggers for “Kosola” and from the MSM (see Brooks, David, New York Times) for hubris and greed.
The Newsweek piece, by Jonathan Darman, features such lines as “It seems as though the rock-thrower is growing up”; “Moulitsas is also learning another downside of membership in the elite: the bigger the liberal sniper gets, the more incoming fire he faces”; and “The pressure on Moulitsas — to be consistent, to be pragmatic, to win — will only grow as the fall elections approach. Already, the strain of the spotlight is beginning to show in his growing belligerence and paranoia.”
Bring on the bloggers.
“Newsweek has a three-pager on Kos and his growing influence in the Democratic Party,” writes Brian Zick at the ITT List. “Aravosis calls it a ‘good story,’ and I suppose, to the extent that perception of power equals reality of power in the bubble of D.C. politics, then it’s ‘good’ that establishment reporters and bubble-minded politicians believe that Kos is someone who has weight to throw around, with the prospects of becoming a kingmaker. Because it means they will pay attention to him.”
But Zick also says Darman’s repeated use of the term “paranoia” appears “much more as a smear than an act of responsible journalism,” and asserts that Kos’s political strategy does not “fit with Newsweek’s preconceived establishmentarian storyline.” He concludes: “The report isn’t a total hatchet job, and it does give passing mention to Markos’ electoral pragmatism. But it is overly suffused with misinformed drek.”
“Well, the MSM seems to be gunning for Kos,” writes Sensible Mom. “Today Newsweek has a profile of Kos that reads like one they’d write about their least favorite Republican — a profile so negative they seem to hope it will turn people against him (of course, 90 percent of the population doesn’t have a clue who Kos is, but never mind that).”
“He gave them the ammunition,” she adds, “with his paranoid response to some simple questions from TNR.”
Ann Althouse ponders the question of paranoia further, writing that “Newsweek goes after Kos but if he says they do, he’s paranoid.” While the story “starts off looking like a puff piece,” with Kos “listening to hummingbirds and finally getting that flat-screen TV,” it is actually “quite hard on him.”
“Kos’s writing style — which has obviously served him well as a blogger up to this point — sounds angry and crazed to the outsider,” Althouse adds. “It’s easy to get him to react with ‘belligerence and paranoia,’ and the more successful he is, the more Democrats are motivated to marginalize and disqualify him.”
Meantime, John Aravosis at AMERICAblog is the only blogger we found who actually liked Newsweek’s work (calling it a good, accurate, and fair story), while TalkLeft compares Newsweek’s “overt attack” on Kos with its “total puff piece on conservative Hugh Hewitt and his plans to combine right-wing talk radio with right-wing bloggers and build an effective right-wing political movement.”
Some bloggers, such as Blue Crab Boulevard, considered the wider implications of the Kos coverage. Asking whether the “Koz Kidz” are ready for the spotlight, the blogger writes, “So the more they react, the harder the media scrutinizes. The more rage they respond with, the more coverage they will get. Not positive coverage, either. This will not get prettier or easier for Kos. The real danger here is that if the media drags him down, they will be trying really hard to bring down all bloggers at the same time.”
“The knives are out,” Blue Crab concludes. “Ready for prime time?”



Kos
His site is so bereft of erudition, interesting items and even humanity that I find it hard to believe that this guy's reported internet traffic is genuine. I have two questions. Can the figures be faked? Has anyone tried to detect whether they are?
Posted by Terry Gain on Mon 26 Jun 2006 at 08:17 PM
I wonder about the makeup of the audience at Daily Kos as well. I comment there on occasion and have noticed that there seem to be a lot of non-US commenters there given the sites US political emphasis.
Posted by Quo Vadis on Mon 26 Jun 2006 at 11:22 PM
You only found one blog that liked the Newsweek article? You must have only turned your head to the left. Might I recommend you check out Just One Minute or even Protein Wisdom?
For my part, out of the whole 'Kosola' scandal I find the obsession with the authenticity of one e-mail of less interest than the facts that the supposedly 'fiercely independent' lefty blogs have been coordinating their messages on a 'secret' e-mail list; that Kos actually seems to have thought they would honor the request to suppress this story; that his partner, handling major sums in leftwing (liberal, progressive, what you will) political donations, is a documented stock swindler; and that Kos's own political sympathies seem to have taken a dramatic swing in at least one campaign when money was placed in his partner's pocket.
Given those facts, if I was a Kos supporter, I'd rather fret over a 22-word e-mail, too.
Posted by richard mcenroe on Tue 27 Jun 2006 at 12:36 AM
Terry,
What counts isn't page "hits" but unique IP visits (that's where the real money/prestige of a site comes from). A site with 600,000 hits a day sounds like a lot, until the hits are broken down between pages, graphics and offsite content (like those blog ads).
[DK's front page contains 34 images, so doing the math you can see how quickly the hits add up on every refresh]
Being a blog/forum crossbreed site, folks have to sit there and refresh the pages, so expect those who stay there for hours are going to refresh at least a couple of times (more likely a hundred times or more) to keep up with new content. It's not very difficult to rack up 50,000 hits by one person in 8hrs or less (I've hit over 74,000 just editing vBulletin templates in one night!).
So yeah, if there's no unique stats, the site popularity can be just folks refreshing the pages (and those guys know enough about SEO to know that uniques are what count, not hits and why their site meter doesn't show them is shady).
I don't know who runs Site Meter, but stats can be manipulated easily by a simple database or flatfile editing. Takes seconds to edit that field.
CXP
Posted by CXP on Tue 27 Jun 2006 at 06:06 AM
This discussion about the readershp of DK is truly pathetic.
If you knew anything about SiteMeter, you'd know that the method it uses to count doesn't include "hits". It's based on page loads, the number of graphics embedded on a page has nothing to do with the count.
Anfd really, just look at the number of people who post to the comments sections and the number of diaries that go up every day. Compare that to the number of comments, say, here at CJRDaily. Do you seriously think that CJR could put together a conference with and get 1,000 people to come? Just use some simple logic, folks, and stop burying your heads in the sand.
Posted by darrelplant on Tue 27 Jun 2006 at 06:21 PM
CXP, you're saying that since Kos gets 600,000 daily hits, and one reader can "rack up 50,000 hits," then Daily Kos only has 12 readers?
Posted by satchel on Wed 5 Jul 2006 at 03:12 PM